<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 lessons museums can learn from Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://museumblogging.com/2008/02/14/10-lessons-museums-can-learn-from-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://museumblogging.com/2008/02/14/10-lessons-museums-can-learn-from-twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microblogging and Learning &#171; It is Time to Tweak eLearning</title>
		<link>http://museumblogging.com/2008/02/14/10-lessons-museums-can-learn-from-twitter/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Microblogging and Learning &#171; It is Time to Tweak eLearning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://museumblogging.com/?p=55#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] museums can learn from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] museums can learn from [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Madsen-Brooks</title>
		<link>http://museumblogging.com/2008/02/14/10-lessons-museums-can-learn-from-twitter/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Madsen-Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://museumblogging.com/?p=55#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hi dianed,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Twitter is different in that you're cultivating a dedicated network to which you subscribe.  So instead of entering a chat room where anyone can drop by, you're in a space where you control whose updates you see.  The result can be an amazingly coherent conversation--if, that is, everyone in your network is subscribed to similar people's updates.  You become privy to much more thoughtful conversations than I've seen in any chat room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi dianed,</p>
<p>Twitter is different in that you&#8217;re cultivating a dedicated network to which you subscribe.  So instead of entering a chat room where anyone can drop by, you&#8217;re in a space where you control whose updates you see.  The result can be an amazingly coherent conversation&#8211;if, that is, everyone in your network is subscribed to similar people&#8217;s updates.  You become privy to much more thoughtful conversations than I&#8217;ve seen in any chat room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dianed</title>
		<link>http://museumblogging.com/2008/02/14/10-lessons-museums-can-learn-from-twitter/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Dianed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://museumblogging.com/?p=55#comment-21</guid>
		<description>To my mind, Twitter is just an other chat in the Web 2.0 way. A discussion in a chat is made of short text, different subjects and group of persons, it's really present.&lt;br/&gt;But we know that chats do not have a great success in the museums websites.&lt;br/&gt;So, why Twitter should be different ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my mind, Twitter is just an other chat in the Web 2.0 way. A discussion in a chat is made of short text, different subjects and group of persons, it&#8217;s really present.<br />But we know that chats do not have a great success in the museums websites.<br />So, why Twitter should be different ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
